tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9666124.post8438325179369646964..comments2023-10-23T10:05:25.643-04:00Comments on Rick Sincere News and Thoughts: Poster Girl for Opposite-Sex MarriageRick Sincerehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02430047101172614629noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9666124.post-77275575900125911142009-02-21T11:06:00.000-05:002009-02-21T11:06:00.000-05:00Good question. I guess some of her marriages may w...Good question. I guess some of her marriages may well be declared nulled invalid if there were not entered with a view to procreation. That's how the neo right wing socialists, who want to impose a kind of Napoleonic Code in the US, define marriage, isn't it? <BR/>By the way, I quite like your glasses. I wouldn't mind marrying you just for that reason. Linda too.<b>Libertymad</b>https://www.blogger.com/profile/00525635065899568702noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9666124.post-20002455976902300532009-02-20T18:48:00.000-05:002009-02-20T18:48:00.000-05:00I may have to agree that this example doesn't do a...I may have to agree that this example doesn't do a lot to promote your cause. I support allowing you to marry because I don't recognize government's right to define and proscribe marriage.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9666124.post-80115935038074808162009-02-20T14:45:00.000-05:002009-02-20T14:45:00.000-05:00Rick, I'm sure JAB doesn't view those marriages as...Rick, I'm sure JAB doesn't view those marriages as shams. And perhaps he has a sister or daughter he'd like to introduce you to, to love and to honor. . .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9666124.post-78764695545866239792009-02-20T14:04:00.000-05:002009-02-20T14:04:00.000-05:00I didn't say that this woman is "prototypical" -- ...I didn't say that this woman is "prototypical" -- just that if she can marry a convicted rapist in prison, then why should law-abiding gay Americans be denied the right to marry?<BR/><BR/>And I'm always amazed that "defenders of marriage" (per JAB) suggest that gay men and lesbians should engage in sham marriages, as if that somehow protects the sanctity of the institution.Rick Sincerehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02430047101172614629noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9666124.post-12716395485132004762009-02-20T11:03:00.000-05:002009-02-20T11:03:00.000-05:00Uh, Rick, if you insist upon holding up this woman...Uh, Rick, if you insist upon holding up this woman as a prototypical example of the "sanctity of marriage," I assume you'll have no objection to me holding up "Sister Boom-Boom" as a prototypical example of a homosexual.<BR/><BR/>I'd expect better of you.James Younghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15983017193858666436noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9666124.post-90016426662168097762009-02-20T06:45:00.000-05:002009-02-20T06:45:00.000-05:00I always wonder why divorcees are presented to peo...I always wonder why divorcees are presented to people who disagree with gay marriage as though they do not believe them to be a threat to marriage. I do believe that women like this are a threat to marriage, just the same as allowing homosexual unions. Divorce has become to easy, but trying to suggest that divorce being common is a reason that gays should be allowed to marry is not a valid talking point, but a diversion, hoping that people will give in just as those who get divorces do.CR UVahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00087674006986070021noreply@blogger.com